![]() ![]() Hardware encoders do have their downsides, though, including: Higher encoding speed, leading to lower latency.Awesome reliability, given that they’re built with one purpose - to encode.Great performance, especially when you need extremely high-quality streaming.The pros of using a hardware encoder are: Usually, there will be some sort of an interface so you can choose between options and, for example, pick the encoding codec or the destination of the stream. They run with an encoding algorithm, as well as a powerful processing unit whose sole job is to run that algorithm. Hardware encoders pack all you need in a neat little box. What are the pros and cons of hardware encoders? The two differ in fundamental ways, and each comes with its own set of pros and cons. In some sense, hardware encoders are very similar to their software counterparts because, by the time you’ve put them into a setup, that’s what they’ll both be - algorithms and hardware.But that’s the end of their similarities. So, should you use a software encoder or a hardware encoder? An encoder is basically an algorithm and the hardware needed to run it. ![]() □ Software and hardware encoders: What are the pros and cons of each?
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |